Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: What's your camera set-up?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Stratford Upon Avon
    Posts
    1,007

    Default What's your camera set-up?

    I haven't done photography since college, and it shows. But I've got a good camera and some good books to get me back into it again. I thought I'd see what everyone else has got too.
    • Nikon f2 camera.
    • Nikon Standard 35mm Lense.
    • Tripod
    • Photoshop
    • Basic panasonic digital camera.
    I'd really like to buy a lense with a much longer focal length. But I'd also really like to buy a powerful macro lense, but these don't seem to be cheap. I do enjoy close up photography though.

    So, I have the basics, and I intend to start using them again soon. How about the rest of you?
    --==Forum Admin Will==--
    Your Friendly Forum Admin. - Contact me.

  2. #2
    Chatterbox optrex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Tamworth
    Posts
    423

    Default

    For basic stuff I am using a Canon 350D with 75-300 and 28-80 zooms.

  3. #3
    Chatterbox
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Atherstone
    Posts
    347

    Default

    I haven't got a Digital Camera as such so use my sony k750i phone camera. I've took some good shots on it although due to the low pixel count they're not as clear as a 10megapixel digital or my SLR's. If I use my SLR, I scan them in to the pc using a flatbed scanner.

    I have no hesitation in using the above to enter, it's not what you've got, it's what you do with it.

    I have an awfull lot of manual focus SLR and some auto focus SLR camera's, mostly canon. You can pick this stuff up relatively cheap nowdays but not from camera shops, it's all camera fayres and ebay. A close up lens is far more usefull than a 300mm
    There's a camera Fayre at wolverhampton Race coure this Sunday I believe.
    Madhatter

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Shizara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Nuneaton
    Posts
    2,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Madhatter View Post
    ........it's not what you've got, it's what you do with it.
    People have different camera specs and brands for different reasons, yet, all are capable of taking a picture. I think one of the biggest differences being that with the higher specced cameras you can cope with a greater range of situations. When your camera is not steadied by a tripod or rested against/on another object then your challenge is not just to get a balanced picture in the viewfinder but to hold it steady, especially when taking pictures with longer exposures.

    I have used disposable cameras in the past and managed to take clear, balanced pictures with focal points of interest. For a while I used a camera with film and because I tend to be a pointNclickaholic, as you can imagine, the cost of processing was rather high. I now have a nice little Canon IXUS which has done much mileage - especially at Disney - however, for a 'quick pic' I often use my Nokia mobile camera - thank goodness for bigger memory cards.

    For those with lower specced cameras your pictures are every bit as important as those from higher specced cameras.
    Cool

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Shizara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Nuneaton
    Posts
    2,359

    Default

    My digital camera has 2 modes. Off or PointNclick.
    Cool

  6. #6
    cathidaw
    Guest

    Default

    whils Ihave a Canon 400D, I also use a 5 megapixel Olympus compact-and the pictures are so good. I think with all the hype about SLRs, these others are underestimated. OK you can do more with an SLR but it all depends on what you want it for.I belong to 3 clubs and only a few have SLRs in 2 of them. How about this for a tale(true)
    A year ago Iwas asked to 'do' a wedding, a posh Society do in an Oxfordshire village . An hour before the wedding Ichecked my camera-the canon and decided to put in a larger '2Gig' card, . as Iwas putting it in someone knocked my elbow, and the card jammed. Did I panic? DID I PANIC? I jolly well did! However I decided to use my little compact--no other choice anyway!
    Obviously I could not do exactly as planned-- this was 5 years old digital point and shoot remember -and I took 180 photo's.
    Results? well thank goodness for Photoshop. I did a beautiful album--or rather an album of beautiful photos for the bride as a a wedding present.
    Many of the photos needed no enhancement.
    I paid about 350 pounds for the compact 5 years ago and the same one is now around £125 with more features.
    It is also good for taking photos to e.mail , or for e.bay as the files are smaller.
    Jessops is pretty good too and Curry's. You can always bargain with Jessops!.
    Last edited by cathidaw; 04-06-2008 at 09:35 PM.

  7. #7
    cathidaw
    Guest

    Default

    Continuing from before.
    Yes Nikon lenses cost two legs but Tamron have had a good write up in the photo mags and someone in one of my clubs has one .He says its excellent and cost a fraction of Nikon. I am going to get the Tamron for my Canon
    PC World have an offer on at the moment.
    I'll let you know----------

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •