View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Aug 13, 2026 5:12 am



Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
 Aspartame sweetener to be listed as ‘possible cancer riskÂ’ 
Author Message
Pillar of the Community
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:10 pm
Posts: 9454
Location: Coventry
Reply with quote
Quote:
Aspartame sweetener to be listed as ‘possible cancer risk’

An artificial sweetener commonly used in thousands of products including diet fizzy drinks, ice cream and chewing gum is to be listed as posing a possible cancer risk to humans, according to reports.

Aspartame will be listed as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” from next month based on the findings of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).

The IARC is preparing to label the sweetener as “possibly carcinogenic to humans”, Reuters reported based on “two sources with knowledge of the process”.

This would mean that there is some evidence linking aspartame to cancer, but that it is limited.

Source and further detail: Belfast Telegraph

_________________
Of course it'll fit, you just need a bigger hammer.


Thu Jun 29, 2023 2:36 pm
Report this post
Profile
Reply with quote
Post 
Thanks for drawing that to our attention rebbonk,
We read about that and read labels, additives etc. Anything with Aspartame and carrageenan in we don't buy for the reasons you stated. I don't know why the WHO allows those kind of additives.
Colds and Flu powders like Lemsip also contain Aspartame. Never purchase these either. But its possible you can now get these Flu powders without Aspartame, I don't know as we don't buy it .


Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:43 am
Report this post
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 5:16 pm
Posts: 72
Reply with quote
Post 
Aspartame has been suspect for at least 40 years. How one proves toxicity, especially, over decades of use is difficult to say.
Then how do you prove causation? Experiments are not done on humans. So, if product X is dosed at a thousand times the level it would ever be given to a human and is found to cause malignancy in, say, mice, then yes there might be a link. If you take in equally large amounts. And you are a mouse. Bertrand Russell even denied there was any such thing as causation. Even today it cannot be said the smoking causes disease. All we can say is that it comes as close to being a cause as it is scientifically possible to be.


Fri Jun 30, 2023 5:55 pm
Report this post
Profile
Pillar of the Community
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:54 am
Posts: 14010
Location: Stratford
Reply with quote
Post 
From the reports I've been listening to, this is only part of the story. The next stage is to work out what the safe/dangerous levels of consumption are.


Sat Jul 01, 2023 4:27 pm
Report this post
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 4 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.