View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Aug 17, 2026 1:01 am



 Post a reply 
Username:
Subject:
Message body:
Enter your message here, it may contain no more than 60000 characters. 

Smilies
:huh: :dancingparty: :crying: :coco: :clapping: :chillpill: :chicken: :cat: :bowdown: :bounce: :blink: :devilred: :dogrun: :hmmm: :hihi: :hiding: :hide: :help: :grouphug: :gag: :fantastisch_01: :evilsmile: :dry: :birthday: :biglaugh: :biggringift: :14: :105: :149: :16suspect1: :Lies: :Protest_emoticon: :Welcome: :beerchug: :) :banghead3: :angel: :band: :banana: ;) :eek: :confused: :D :mad: :o :( :rolleyes: :p :cool:
View more smilies
Font size:
Tip: Styles can be applied quickly to selected text.  Font colour
Options:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Disable BBCode
Disable smilies
Do not automatically parse URLs
Confirmation code
Confirmation code
Confirmation code:
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
   

 Topic review - One rule for you, another for them... 
Author Message

Reply with quote Post Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 3:42 pm
One rule for you, another for them...
I find this outrageous....

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2713027/Secret-justice-row-judge-bans-naming-two-councillors-failed-pay-council-tax-two-years-cause-distress-against-human-rights.html

Seems these privacy laws they trumpet so much only seem to favour the select few?

Would you vote for a local politician if you knew they were not paying the taxes that they set and can imprison you not for paying?

:mad: :mad: :mad:


Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.