Warwickshire Online Chat Forum

Author	Message
cathidaw	Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 11:34 pm rebbonk wrote: Art is something I simply don't understand. You don't have to understand art.Just enjoy what YOU like. [quote="rebbonk"]Art is something I simply don't understand.[/quote] You don't have to understand art.Just enjoy what YOU like.

Margaret	Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 9:15 am Is this quite right? Wasn't Warwick the King maker, or his father, the first Earl of Warwick. The King maker married into the Warwick family , so presumably there were other Earls of Warwick before him. How can an 18th century Greville be the first Earl when the title goes back to the middle ages? . Is this quite right? Wasn't Warwick the King maker, or his father, the first Earl of Warwick. The King maker married into the Warwick family , so presumably there were other Earls of Warwick before him. How can an 18th century Greville be the first Earl when the title goes back to the middle ages? . :huh:

rebbonk	Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:30 pm Art is something I simply don't understand. Art is something I simply don't understand.

Lex	Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2014 5:04 pm Portrait of the 1st Earl of warwick Sold £400,000's not a bad price: http://www.warwickcourier.co.uk/news/local-news/warwick-portrait-sold-for-nearly-400-000-1-6469628 £400,000's not a bad price: [url]http://www.warwickcourier.co.uk/news/local-news/warwick-portrait-sold-for-nearly-400-000-1-6469628[/url]

Portrait of the 1st Earl of warwick Sold