Warwickshire Online Chat Forum

Author	Message
chillitt	Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:55 pm Dexter wrote: Lsee the council's planning dept are not as stupid as we thought! If they were, then they wouldn't be able to find their way to work in the morning... [quote="Dexter"]Lsee the council's planning dept are not as stupid as we thought![/quote] If they were, then they wouldn't be able to find their way to work in the morning... :rolleyes:

Dexter	Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:35 pm Lex you are far too cynical...In fact this tower will actually save money as you quite rightly say it can be used as as a tourist attraction (blimey who on earth authorised that blot on the landscape a tourist was over heard to say!) and a firemans practice tower on rescuing people from tall buildings..see the council's planning dept are not as stupid as we thought! Lex you are far too cynical...In fact this tower will actually save money as you quite rightly say it can be used as as a tourist attraction (blimey who on earth authorised that blot on the landscape a tourist was over heard to say!) and a firemans practice tower on rescuing people from tall buildings..see the council's planning dept are not as stupid as we thought!

Will	Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:43 pm Cool, they can build some pretty ridiculous and monstrous stuff with two Million pounds, I'm sure they will as well. That's good news about the bridge though, it was utterly pointless. Cool, they can build some pretty ridiculous and monstrous stuff with two Million pounds, I'm sure they will as well. That's good news about the bridge though, it was utterly pointless.

David1976	Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:55 pm They'll probably dye the grass green next like the Brummies did for President Clinton. David See my online shopping centre Dave's Place - Part of the ei42 Shopping Network Get Your Own FREE Here Ei42.com - Everything on the Internet and 42, the Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything They'll probably dye the grass green next like the Brummies did for President Clinton. David See my online shopping centre [url=http://www.ei42.com/davesplace]Dave's Place - Part of the ei42 Shopping Network[/url] Get Your Own FREE Here [url=http://www.ei42.com/?10849647]Ei42.com - Everything on the Internet and 42, the Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything[/url]

Dexter	Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 2:56 pm I wonder why they chose to do that eh? sigh I'm rather hoping somebody blows the bloody thing up once its built..Perhaps the council would finally get the message then! I wonder why they chose to do that eh? sigh I'm rather hoping somebody blows the bloody thing up once its built..Perhaps the council would finally get the message then!

Will	Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:55 am Glad you agree. Yes, we've been talking about the hideous tower for the RSC on another thread. I think Chillit hit the nail on the head when he said it looked like the practise tower for the fire brigade. Glad you agree. :) Yes, we've been talking about the hideous tower for the RSC on another thread. I think Chillit hit the nail on the head when he said it looked like the practise tower for the fire brigade.

Unregistered	Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:42 pm Oh Yes, and who designed that hideous tower beside the RSC, it just is not in keeping with the place at all. total waste of money building it. Who got paid for designing that ! ?? Hands off the RSC ! Oh Yes, and who designed that hideous tower beside the RSC, it just is not in keeping with the place at all. total waste of money building it. Who got paid for designing that ! ?? Hands off the RSC !

Unregistered	Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:37 pm I also opposed the plans to put a bridge over the river at Stratford. Glad to hear Will did too. It wil be an eyesore and obscure the beautiful view down river. I am glad there are not so much bikers parking along waterside by the theatre as well. I also opposed the plans to put a bridge over the river at Stratford. Glad to hear Will did too. It wil be an eyesore and obscure the beautiful view down river. I am glad there are not so much bikers parking along waterside by the theatre as well.

marapets	Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 1:03 pm sounds like a bit of a waste of my taxes does that! sounds like a bit of a waste of my taxes does that!

Will	Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:50 pm Just watched an article about this on the Beeb, even the reporters slipped out a minor editorial at the end, saying what a beautiful view that area has. To me that seems to imply they wouldn't like to see it ruined either, and there was me thinking that Beeb reporters were too meek to do such a thing. Just watched an article about this on the Beeb, even the reporters slipped out a minor editorial at the end, saying what a beautiful view that area has. To me that seems to imply they wouldn't like to see it ruined either, and there was me thinking that Beeb reporters were too meek to do such a thing. :)

Madhatter	Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 11:07 am They are all vile, design two being the best. I can not understand why wnyone would want to put a shiney metallic bridge amongst such classic architecture. It doesn't make sense. Whats wrong with a classic wrought iron style bridge, something traditional, fancy, scrolley. I find it quite annoying, it winds me up and I live in the north of the county so god knows how Stratford people feel. They are all vile, design two being the best. I can not understand why wnyone would want to put a shiney metallic bridge amongst such classic architecture. It doesn't make sense. Whats wrong with a classic wrought iron style bridge, something traditional, fancy, scrolley. I find it quite annoying, it winds me up and I live in the north of the county so god knows how Stratford people feel.

Will	Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 1:13 pm Oh, there's been a bit kerfuffle in Stratford for a while. As part of the "World Class Stratford" scheme, the council wants to build an expensive and unsightly bridge over one of our most scenic stretches of water. The opposition has been fierce, and I would count myself among those opposed to it. Oh, there's been a bit kerfuffle in Stratford for a while. As part of the "World Class Stratford" scheme, the council wants to build an expensive and unsightly bridge over one of our most scenic stretches of water. The opposition has been fierce, and I would count myself among those opposed to it.

optrex	Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 1:04 pm What bridge is that Will? What bridge is that Will?

Will	Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:39 pm 64% of people opposed to Bridge Local Lib dems have canvassed 11,500 homes and found that 65% of residents are totally opposed to the bridge, while more more are opposed to the bridge where it's currently planned, prefering it to be a replacement for Lucy's Bridge. So it's not looking too rosy for current plans, will this make any difference? Who knows. Local Lib dems have canvassed 11,500 homes and found that 65% of residents are totally opposed to the bridge, while more more are opposed to the bridge where it's currently planned, prefering it to be a replacement for Lucy's Bridge. So it's not looking too rosy for current plans, will this make any difference? Who knows.

64% of people opposed to Bridge