Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: New HQ for Warwick District Council

  1. #1
    Administrator Lex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    4,410

    Default New HQ for Warwick District Council

    Sounds like a good plan; 2 buildings that basically need rearing town will be replaced by housing, car parking and what sounds like much needed new council offices: http://www.warwickcourier.co.uk/news...ntre-1-7330743

  2. #2
    rebbonk
    Guest

    Default

    Well, Coventry's figures don't stack up for their new headquarters, I hope these do.

  3. #3
    Administrator Lex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    4,410

    Default

    I doubt the 300,000 the council claims it will save will translate into reduced council tax bills: http://www.leamingtoncourier.co.uk/n...iled-1-7961827

  4. #4
    rebbonk
    Guest

    Default

    ...the new Council headquarters should cost the council nothing
    plus 300,000 a year saving: what's not to like?

    It's high time those suggesting these figures should be held accountable. And when the savings don't materialise (because they won't!) they should be held for malfeasance in public office and face doing time for misleading (lying to) the general public.

    Get a political party to put that in their manifesto and you have the UK political system sewn up for years to come.

  5. #5
    Administrator Lex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    4,410

    Default

    If this goes the way public sector projects tend to, the sale of the old offices will be significantly less than expected, the cost of the new building will be significantly over budget, and any savings will just disappear in the general inefficient governmental machine (maybe with a bit left over for a couple of vanity projects, or something actually useful just before an election).

  6. #6
    rebbonk
    Guest

    Default

    Which proves that those doing the jobs aren't doing a very good job at all.

    Of all the projects I have run, I've never run over budget and I've only over run on time a couple of times, and those times were down to ever moving goal-posts.

    This lack of performance in the public sector is not on, and we ought not allow it. People must be held accountable to their promises.

  7. #7
    Administrator Lex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    4,410

  8. #8
    Administrator Lex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    4,410

    Default

    The plans have been submitted. I'm not convinced the numbers work out, but no doubt the scheme will be waved through anyway: http://www.leamingtoncourier.co.uk/n...tted-1-8161014

  9. #9
    rebbonk
    Guest

    Default

    The leader of the council ought be held personally responsible for this. If (when) it doesn't pan out as the electorate are led to believe, his assets ought be up for grabs.

  10. #10
    Administrator Lex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    4,410

  11. #11
    Super Moderator rebbonk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    247

    Default

    I stand by my previous comment.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •