I think Dr. Yeadon is trying to be scrupulously fair.
What we have here is a new technology on the back of old vaccines. Think about this. We are not stimulating the immune system to produce anti bodies to render some ailment ineffective. A technology is being introduced into the body to actually produce the ailment itself. If you apply the systems approach to the body, the first question to ask is " what is this doing to the immune system?" You are not asking the immune system to combat the enemy. But the enemy itself is being mass produced within the body itself. The immune system is at huge risk of collapsing because it is simply unable to read the messages being sent to it. What is going to happen to the bodies susceptibility to other diseases? (Jenner's vaccine saw an exponential rise in TB rates). No one knows, even the medium term let alone the long term effects of this experimental technology.. But we do know that the Pharma companies and by extension the government have complete immunity.
Just a couple of points on vaccines generally - that is the older style ones. The historical record is quite clear on this. improvements in public health followed improvements in sanitation, hygiene, housing, clean water & diet. Vaccines were either ineffective or noxious.
TB rates fell 100 years before the introduction of vaccines, due to better water. Polio fell for the same reason (and even increased but was renamed aseptic meningitis).
Major epidemics follows both world wars and were due to the near complete collapse of public health systems.
Dr. Yeadon makes some good points. But you can sense through the interview that he knows far more than he is letting on. Because his is aware that he is dealing with formidable opponents, who are entrenched in power at the highest level. I had to give a wry laugh when he said we live in a liberal democracy. Please.
Bookmarks