Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Aspartame sweetener to be listed as ‘possible cancer risk’

  1. #1
    Super Moderator rebbonk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Coventry
    Posts
    7,576

    Default Aspartame sweetener to be listed as ‘possible cancer risk’

    Aspartame sweetener to be listed as ‘possible cancer risk’

    An artificial sweetener commonly used in thousands of products including diet fizzy drinks, ice cream and chewing gum is to be listed as posing a possible cancer risk to humans, according to reports.

    Aspartame will be listed as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” from next month based on the findings of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).

    The IARC is preparing to label the sweetener as “possibly carcinogenic to humans”, Reuters reported based on “two sources with knowledge of the process”.

    This would mean that there is some evidence linking aspartame to cancer, but that it is limited.
    Source and further detail: Belfast Telegraph
    Of course it'll fit, you just need a bigger hammer.

  2. #2
    Pillar of the Community margaret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    2,357

    Default

    Thanks for drawing that to our attention rebbonk,
    We read about that and read labels, additives etc. Anything with Aspartame and carrageenan in we don't buy for the reasons you stated. I don't know why the WHO allows those kind of additives.
    Colds and Flu powders like Lemsip also contain Aspartame. Never purchase these either. But its possible you can now get these Flu powders without Aspartame, I don't know as we don't buy it .
    Last edited by margaret; 30-06-2023 at 08:52 AM.
    “I doubt sometimes whether a quiet and unagitated life would have suited me - yet I sometimes long for it.”

    - Lord Byron.

  3. #3

    Default

    Aspartame has been suspect for at least 40 years. How one proves toxicity, especially, over decades of use is difficult to say.
    Then how do you prove causation? Experiments are not done on humans. So, if product X is dosed at a thousand times the level it would ever be given to a human and is found to cause malignancy in, say, mice, then yes there might be a link. If you take in equally large amounts. And you are a mouse. Bertrand Russell even denied there was any such thing as causation. Even today it cannot be said the smoking causes disease. All we can say is that it comes as close to being a cause as it is scientifically possible to be.

  4. #4
    Administrator Lex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    12,069

    Default

    From the reports I've been listening to, this is only part of the story. The next stage is to work out what the safe/dangerous levels of consumption are.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •